Ferrell v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (PLR2)

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Eastern District Ferrell v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (PLR2)

Ferrell v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (PLR2)

Plaintiff:	William Virgil Ferrell
Defendant:	Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Case Number:	1:2016cv00050
Filed:	March 3, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office:	Chattanooga Office
County:	Hamblen
Presiding Judge:	Pamela L Reeves
Presiding Judge:	Christopher H Steger
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 10, 2019	Filing 53 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Judge Stegers Report & Recommendation 46 is ACCEPTEDIN WHOLE. Plaintiffs motion on the administrative record 35 is GRANTED IN PART, and Defendants motion for summary judgment 36 is DENIED. The Commissione rs decision is accordingly REVERSED and REMANDED, under this Courts authority in 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further administrative proceedings. On remand, the Commissioner should reevaluate Plaintiffs claim in light of the Earley decision as interpreted by this Court. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 5/10/19. (c/m to William Virgil Ferrell, 1651 Mcafee Road, Morrison, TN 37357) (ABF)
July 14, 2017	Filing 18 ORDER adopting 13 Report and Recommendations and William Ferrells suit is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 7/14/17. (c/m to William Ferrell, 1651 Mcafee Road, Morrison, TN 37357) (ABF)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 10, 2019

Filing 53 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Judge Stegers Report & Recommendation 46 is ACCEPTEDIN WHOLE. Plaintiffs motion on the administrative record 35 is GRANTED IN PART, and Defendants motion for summary judgment 36 is DENIED. The Commissione rs decision is accordingly REVERSED and REMANDED, under this Courts authority in 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further administrative proceedings. On remand, the Commissioner should reevaluate Plaintiffs claim in light of the Earley decision as interpreted by this Court. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 5/10/19. (c/m to William Virgil Ferrell, 1651 Mcafee Road, Morrison, TN 37357) (ABF)

July 14, 2017

Filing 18 ORDER adopting 13 Report and Recommendations and William Ferrells suit is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 7/14/17. (c/m to William Ferrell, 1651 Mcafee Road, Morrison, TN 37357) (ABF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ferrell v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (PLR2)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Virgil Ferrell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?