United States of America v. One Hundred Twenty-Five (125) Firearms and Seventeen Thousand Six Hundred Forty-Two (17,642) Rounds of Ammunition

Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: One Hundred Twenty-Five (125) Firearms and Seventeen Thousand Six Hundred Forty-Two (17,642) Rounds of Ammunition
Case Number: 1:2016cv00089
Filed: April 13, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office: Chattanooga Office
County: Hamilton
Presiding Judge: Curtis L Collier
Presiding Judge: Susan K Lee
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 21:881
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. One Hundred Twenty-Five (125) Firearms and Seventeen Thousand Six Hundred Forty-Two (17,642) Rounds of Ammunition
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Anne-Marie Svolto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: One Hundred Twenty-Five (125) Firearms and Seventeen Thousand Six Hundred Forty-Two (17,642) Rounds of Ammunition
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?