Howard-Hill v. Carlton Spence et al (TV1)
| Jean Howard-Hill |
| Carlton Spence and Mini Max Storage |
| 1:2016cv00441 |
| November 1, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Chattanooga Office |
| Hamilton |
| Susan K Lee |
| Thomas A Varlan |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 37 Motion to Amend/Correct; granting in part and denying in part 28 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs motion to amend her memorandum in opposition to Defendants motion for summary judgment [ Doc. 37] is GRANTED. Defendants motion for summary judgment [Doc. 28] is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The motion is GRANTED to the extent Defendants seek a finding that Plaintiff is bound by the terms of the leases, including the limita tion of value provisions, for units #62, #64, #119, #135, #139, #150, #161, #198, and #271. Defendants motion is DENIED to the extent it seeks summary judgment based on the Tennessee Self-Service Storage Facility Act, Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 66-31- 104 & -105, and to the extent it seeks summary judgment on Plaintiffs fraud and breach of contract claims arising from the alleged agreement to postpone the auction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 10/11/2017. (BDG, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
