Teasley v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al (PLR2)
R. Kenneth Teasley |
Jesse Riggins and CSX Transportation, Inc. |
1:2018cv00193 |
August 21, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Susan K Lee |
Pamela L Reeves |
Federal Employer's Liability |
45 U.S.C. § 51 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
Filing 12 NOTICE OF NONCONSENT by CSX Transportation, Inc., Jesse Riggins (Baker, John) |
|
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by CSX Transportation, Inc., Jesse Riggins.(Baker, John) |
|
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by CSX Transportation, Inc., Jesse Riggins. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Baker, John) |
Filing 7 Certificate of Corporate Interest by CSX Transportation, Inc.. (Baker, John) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by John W Baker, Jr on behalf of CSX Transportation, Inc., Jesse Riggins (Baker, John) |
|
|
|
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons Riggins)(aws, ) |
District Judge Pamela L Reeves and Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee added. (aws, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0649-3750116.), filed by R. Kenneth Teasley. (Attachments: #1 Other Civil cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons to CSX, #3 Summons Summons to J. Riggins)(Colvin, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.