Graham v. Marion County et al
William Graham |
Marion County, Jane Doe, Johnathan Wingo and John Doe |
1:2018cv00280 |
November 19, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
J Ronnie Greer |
Christopher H Steger |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE OF CONSENT Amended by Marion County, Johnathan Wingo (LeQuire, Thomas) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF NONCONSENT by Plaintiff and by Marion County, Johnathan Wingo (LeQuire, Thomas) |
Filing 4 ORDER: The parties are ordered to confer and return the attached form within the time provided.Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 12/17/18. (Attachments: #1 Other Notice of Consent/Non-Consent) (aws, ) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by Marion County, Johnathan Wingo.(LeQuire, Thomas) |
Filing 2 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Plaintiff and by Marion County, Johnathan Wingo. (LeQuire, Thomas) |
District Judge J Ronnie Greer and Magistrate Judge Christopher H Steger added. (ABF) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marion Co. Circuit, case number 22052. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0649-3821099), filed by Johnathan Wingo, Marion County. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Copy of Process and Pleadings filed in Marion Co. Circuit Court, #2 Other Civil Cover Sheet)(LeQuire, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.