Lee v. City of Chattanooga, et al (PLR1)
Darren D. Lee |
Jim Spence, Justin Holland, Andy Berke, City of Chattanooga and Jeff Rose |
1:2019cv00159 |
May 24, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Pamela L Reeves |
Christopher H Steger |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Darren D. Lee. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(DJH) |
Copy of notice and docket sheet mailed to plaintiff Darren Lee (DJH) |
Filing 6 Order Governing Sealing Confidential InformationSigned by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 5/24/2019. (DJH) |
Filing 5 Order Governing Motions To DismissSigned by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 5/24/2019. (DJH) |
Filing 4 Order Governing DepositionsSigned by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 5/24/2019. (DJH) |
Filing 3 Notice Regarding Requirement to Notify Court of Change of Address (DJH) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against City of Chattanooga, Andy Berke, Justin Holland, Jeff Rose, Jim Spence (Filing fee $ IFP Pending.), filed by Darren D. Lee. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(DJH) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Darren D. Lee. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(DJH) |
No summons received with initiating documents. Therefore, summons not issued as to Andy Berke, City of Chattanooga, Justin Holland, Jeff Rose, Jim Spence. (DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.