Gilmore v. City of Collegedale et al (PLR2)
| Matthew Colten Gilmore |
| Jordan Long and City of Collegedale |
| 1:2019cv00359 |
| December 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Susan K Lee |
| Pamela L Reeves |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE by Jordan Long(Officer, in his individual capacity ), Jordan Long(Officer, in his official capacities as agent and employee of the City of Collegedale) of Service of Defendant Long's First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents Propounded to Plaintiff (Lauderback, Benjamin) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE by Jordan Long(Officer, in his individual capacity ), Jordan Long(Officer, in his official capacities as agent and employee of the City of Collegedale) of Service of This Defendant's Rule 26 Initial Disclosures (Lauderback, Benjamin) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE by Matthew Colten Gilmore of delivery of initial disclosures upon counsel (Attachments: #1 Exhibit email to counsel)(Flores, Robin) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF NONCONSENT to Magistrate by Parties by City of Collegedale (Wells, Philip) |
| Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Flores, Robin) |
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER: The trial of this case will be held before the undersigned United States District Judge, with a jury, beginning on TUESDAY, JULY 27, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. in Knoxville, Tennessee in Courtroom 3C. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on January 3, 2020. (AYB)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: The parties are ordered to confer and return the attached form within the time provided.Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 12/23/19. (KFB) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/23/2019: #1 Other consent/nonconsent) (KFB).
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by City of Collegedale.(Wells, Philip) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Jordan Long(Officer, in his individual capacity ), Jordan Long(Officer, in his official capacities as agent and employee of the City of Collegedale).(Lauderback, Benjamin) |
|
Filing 4
Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 12/13/2019. (CAT)
|
|
Filing 3
Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 12/13/2019. (CAT)
|
|
Filing 2
Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information.Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 12/13/2019. (CAT)
|
| District Judge Pamela L Reeves and Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee added. (CAT) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hamilton County Circuit Court, case number 19C1289. (Filing Fee $400 receipt number G2012045), filed by Jordan Long, City of Collegedale. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1: Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2: Hamilton County Circuit Court Summons issued to City of Collegedale, #3 Exhibit 3: Hamilton County Circuit Court Summons issued to Jordan Long, #4 Exhibit 4: Affidavit of Service as to City of Collegedale, #5 Exhibit 5: Affidavit of Service as to Jordan Long, #6 Other Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Other Notification to Hamilton County Circuit Court of Removal of Cause, #8 Other Notice of Removal to Hamilton County Circuit Court of Removal of Cause to Federal Court)(Lauderback, Benjamin) Modified to reflect filing fee payment received and docketed on 12/13/2019 (CAT). Modified on 12/20/2019 to correct Defendant Long's name in docket text(BJL). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
