Hidalgo v. Wolf et al
| Santos Silvestre Lopez Hidalgo |
| Chad F Wolf, Julie L Myers and The United States of America |
| 1:2020cv00005 |
| January 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Travis R McDonough |
| Christopher H Steger |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
JUDGMENT re #3 Memorandum & Opinion.In accordance with memorandum opinion entered herewith, the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED [Doc. 1], and this action is DISMISSED. Because the Court CERTIFIED in the memorandum opinion that any appeal from this order would not be taken ingood faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Fed. R. App. P. 24. Signed by District Judge Travis R McDonough on 1/10/2020. (BDG)Judgment mailed to Hidalgo.
|
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. The instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus [Doc. 1] will be DENIED, and this action will be DISMISSED.Signed by District Judge Travis R McDonough on 1/10/2020. (BDG)Memo mailed to Hidalgo. |
| Filing 2 Notice Regarding Requirement to Notify Court of Change of Address (BDG)Notice mailed to Hidalgo. |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Santos Silvestre Lopez Hidalgo.(BDG)Receipt number c1017248. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
