Callahan v. WNA American Plastic Industries, Inc. et al
| Walter Callahan |
| Randstad General Partner (US), LLC, Randstad US, LLC, WNA American Plastic Industries, Inc. and Randstad North America, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv00035 |
| January 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Certificate of Corporate Interest by Randstad General Partner (US), LLC, Randstad North America, Inc., Randstad US, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Randstad Luxembourg UK Limited, Corporate Parent Randstad Holding NV for Randstad North America, Inc.; Corporate Parent Randstad General Partner (US), LLC, Corporate Parent Randstad North America, Inc. for Randstad US, LLC; Corporate Parent Randstad North America, Inc for Randstad General Partner (US), LLC. (Crowder, Jennifer) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Chancery Court of Hamilton County, case number 19-0887. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ATNEDC-4216351), filed by Randstad North America, Inc., Randstad General Partner (US), LLC, Randstad US, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court documents, #2 Exhibit B - Declaration of Karen Lubrano, #3 Exhibit C - Clerk and Plaintiff Notice of Filing, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Crowder, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
