Viking Industrial, Inc. v. Industrial Development Board of Bradley County and the City of Cleveland et al
| Viking Industrial, Inc. |
| Wacker Chemical Corporation, Wacker Polysilicon North America, LLC and Industrial Development Board of Bradley County and the City of Cleveland |
| 1:2020cv00116 |
| May 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Clifton L Corker |
| Christopher H Steger |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 STIPULATION of Dismissal of case with Prejudice by Viking Industrial, Inc.. (Patrick, Gary) |
Filing 17
ORDER: On June 29, 2020, the Court received notice that the parties have settled all claims in the above-captioned action. As such, the parties shall have 30 days from the entry of this order to file a Stipulation of Dismissal. If additional time is needed to file the Stipulation, the parties may so notify the Court and request an extension. If a Stipulation is not filed and an extension is not requested, then the Court will dismiss this case after 30 days based upon the notice to the Court. Signed by District Judge Clifton L Corker on 06/29/2020. (CAT)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER: Generally, scheduling orders will be entered by the Court after a telephonic scheduling conference unless otherwise requested by the parties. It is therefore ORDERED: As soon as practicable, but in no event later than 30 days from the first appearance of a defendant, or if that has already occurred, within 30 days of this order, the parties must confer, in a conference arranged by plaintiff's counsel, for the purpose of considering the nature and basis of their claims and defenses. See Order for details. Signed by District Judge Clifton L Corker on 06/04/2020. (CAT)
|
| Filing 15 RESPONSE to Motion re #5 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss Verified Complaint filed by Viking Industrial, Inc.. (Patrick, Gary) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE to Motion re #7 First MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Viking Industrial, Inc.. (Patrick, Gary) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER: The parties are ordered to confer and return the attached form within the time provided.Signed by District Judge Clifton L Corker on May 22, 2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent/Non-Consent form-atty-flatten/print to pdf for ECF filing(non-fillable format)) (SAC)
|
|
Filing 12
Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information.Signed by District Judge Clifton L Corker on May 22, 2020. (SAC)
|
|
Filing 11
Order Governing Motions To Dismiss.Signed by District Judge Clifton L Corker on May 22, 2020. (SAC)
|
|
Filing 10
Order Governing Depositions.Signed by District Judge Clifton L Corker on May 22, 2020. (SAC)
|
| District Judge Clifton L Corker and Magistrate Judge Christopher H Steger added pursuant to related case order. (SAC) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER RELATING CASES. Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2(d)(3), the undersigned finds that the above-captioned case is related to Case No. 1:20-cv-69. The Court finds that these cases arise out of the same transaction or occurrence and involve one or more of the same parties. Therefore, the two cases are related. See E.D. Tenn. L.R. 3.2(d)(3)(A)(1). Because the first of these cases was assigned to District Judge Clifton Corker and Magistrate Judge Christopher Steger, this case will also be assigned to those same judges. However, consolidation is not ordered. This entry is the complete order of the Court. No document is attached. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher H Steger on 5/21/2020. (Steger, Christopher)
|
| Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #7 First MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Industrial Development Board of Bradley County and the City of Cleveland. (Buchanan, Ginger) |
| Filing 7 First MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Industrial Development Board of Bradley County and the City of Cleveland. (Buchanan, Ginger) |
| Filing 6 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #5 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss Verified Complaint filed by Wacker Chemical Corporation, Wacker Polysilicon North America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Master Services Agreement)(Fullerton, Jenna) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss Verified Complaint by Wacker Chemical Corporation, Wacker Polysilicon North America, LLC. (Fullerton, Jenna) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Ginger Wilson Buchanan on behalf of Industrial Development Board of Bradley County and the City of Cleveland (Buchanan, Ginger) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Corporate Interest by Wacker Polysilicon North America, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Wacker Chemical Corporation for Wacker Polysilicon North America, LLC. (Fullerton, Jenna) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Corporate Interest by Wacker Chemical Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Wacker Chemicals Finance B.V. for Wacker Chemical Corporation. (Fullerton, Jenna) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Bradley County Chancery, case number 2020-CV-143. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ATNEDC-4330715), filed by Wacker Chemical Corporation, Wacker Polysilicon North America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - State Court Rule Docket Report, #3 Other Civil Cover Sheet)(Fullerton, Jenna) |
| Case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Steger for related case determination. (CAT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
