Zee Company, Incorporated v. David
Zee Company, Incorporated |
Richard David |
1:2020cv00143 |
June 4, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Curtis L Collier |
Christopher H Steger |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER. The #9 Show Cause Order is DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 7/30/2020. (AML) |
Filing 11 Administrative Notice to Counsel #10 Application for Clerk's Default, : requirements due by 7/27/2020. (CNC) |
Filing 10 APPLICATION for Clerk's Default as to Richard David by Zee Company, Incorporated. Party is instructed to email the proposed default to the clerk at the appropriate email address in accordance with #http://www.tned.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms/civil_forms. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Yates, C) |
Filing 9 ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that within twenty-one days of the date of entry of this Order: (1) Defendant shall respond to the complaint; OR(2) Plaintiff shall move for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55(a); OR(3) Plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b).Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 7/2/20. (CNC) |
Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons In a Civil Action served on Richard Davis on 06/05/2020, filed by Zee Company, Incorporated. (Yates, C) |
Filing 7 Certificate of Corporate Interest by Zee Company, Incorporated identifying Corporate Parent The Vincit Company, L.L.C. d/b/a Vincit Enterprises for Zee Company, Incorporated. (Yates, C) |
Filing 6 Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 6/5/2020. (AWS) |
Filing 5 Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 6/5/2020. (AWS) |
Filing 4 Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 6/5/2020. (AWS) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (AWS) |
Filing 2 Administrative Notice to Counsel #1 Complaint: requirements due by 6/10/2020. (AWS) |
District Judge Curtis L Collier and Magistrate Judge Christopher H Steger added. (AWS) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Verified against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ATNEDC-4364653.), filed by Zee Company, Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Jonathon Bullard, #2 Exhibit Exhibits A-E to the Complaint, #3 Summons, #4 Other Corporate Disclosure Statement, #5 Other Civil Case Cover Sheet)(Yates, C) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Zee Company, Incorporated v. David | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Zee Company, Incorporated | |
Represented By: | C Allen Yates |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Richard David | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.