Mayac et al v. Roehl Transport, Inc. et al
| Peter Mayac and Michelle Mayac |
| Roehl Transport, Inc. and Michael Wilmot |
| 1:2020cv00187 |
| July 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Curtis L Collier |
| Susan K Lee |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 07/07/2020. (AMP)
|
|
Filing 4
Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 07/07/2020. (AMP)
|
|
Filing 3
Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 07/07/2020. (AMP)
|
| Filing 2 Certificate of Corporate Interest by Roehl Transport, Inc. (Gardella, Andrew) Modified on 7/7/2020 to reflect correct document filed (AMP). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL of Defendants Roehl Transport, Inc. and Michael Wilmot from Marion County, Tennessee Circuit Court, case number 22526. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ATNEDC-4404415), filed by Roehl Transport, Inc., Michael Wilmot. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Other Civil Cover Sheet)(Gardella, Andrew) |
| District Judge Curtis L Collier and Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee added. (AMP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
