Leach v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Plaintiff: Jason Leach
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA and Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Case Number: 1:2020cv00350
Filed: December 14, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Clifton L Corker
Referring Judge: Christopher H Steger
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 4, 2021 Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT in Support re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis updated and complete filed by Jason Leach. (Jackson, Forrest)
January 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [Doc. 2]. In support of this motion, Plaintiff has attached an application which contains information about Plaintiff's financial status. Plaintiff has signed this application under penalty of perjury. However, Plaintiff has not answered question 5 which asks if Plaintiff owns any valuable property. Plaintiff shall have until February 19, 2021, to resubmit his application answering all the questions on the application form. Failure to submit the completed application may result in administrative dismissal of the action.Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher H Steger on 1-21-21. This entry is the complete Order of the Court. (KMG)
December 15, 2020 District Judge Clifton L Corker and Magistrate Judge Christopher H Steger added. (ABF)
December 14, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jason Leach. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Application to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs)(Jackson, Forrest)
December 14, 2020 Filing 1 SSA COMPLAINT against Commissioner of SSA, filed by Jason Leach. (Attachments: #1 Other Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons #1, #3 Summons #2, #4 Summons #3, #5 Supplement Assignment of EAJA Fees)(Jackson, Forrest)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Leach v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason Leach
Represented By: Forrest Earl Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?