Phelps v. Teksystems, Inc. et al
| Tony Phelps |
| U.S. Xpress, Inc., Teksystems, Inc. and U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv00092 |
| May 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Katherine A Crytzer |
| Christopher H Steger |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER granting #18 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Amended Complaint until July 21, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher H Steger on 6-29-21. This entry is the Order of the Court. There is no document attached. (KMG)
|
| Filing 19 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Teksystems, Inc., U.S. Xpress, Inc.., filed by Tony Phelps. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Arbitration Agreement)(Pinchak, Frank) |
| Filing 18 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by U.S. Xpress, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Other Proposed Agreed Order)(Lee, Charles) |
| Filing 17 STIPULATION (Stipulated) Extension of Time by Teksystems, Inc.. (Stevens, C) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by C Eric Stevens on behalf of Teksystems, Inc. (Stevens, C) |
| Filing 15 STIPULATION of Extension of Time by U.S. Xpress, Inc.. (Lee, Charles) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of party U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. by Tony Phelps (Hahn, Madison) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tony Phelps. Teksystems, Inc. served on 5/11/2021. (Pinchak, Frank) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tony Phelps. U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. served on 5/11/2021. (Pinchak, Frank) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tony Phelps. U.S. Xpress, Inc. served on 5/11/2021. (Pinchak, Frank) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee no longer assigned to case. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Christopher H Steger for all further proceedings. Signed by District Judge Travis R McDonough on May 11, 2021. (SAC)
|
| Filing 9 Certificate of Corporate Interest by U.S. Xpress, Inc.. (Lee, Charles) |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Corporate Interest by U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc.. (Lee, Charles) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 05/10/2021. (KRS)
|
| NOTICE OF FAILURE TO FILE Certificate of Corporate Interest as required by FRCP 7.1 by U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., U.S. Xpress, Inc.. (BDG) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Charles B Lee on behalf of U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., U.S. Xpress, Inc. (Lee, Charles) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Teksystems, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued as to US Xpress Enterprises, Inc., #2 Summons Issued as to US Xpress, Inc.)(AML) |
|
Filing 4
Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge Katherine A Crytzer on 5/5/2021. (AML)
|
|
Filing 3
Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Katherine A Crytzer on 5/5/2021. (AML)
|
|
Filing 2
Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge Katherine A Crytzer on 5/5/2021. (AML)
|
| District Judge Katherine A Crytzer and Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee added. (AML) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNEDC-4727839.), filed by Tony Phelps. (Attachments: #1 Other Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Teksystems. Inc., #3 Summons U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., #4 Summons U.S. Xpress, Inc.)(Pinchak, Frank) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
