Peeks v. Belk, Inc.
Plaintiff: Jamie Peeks
Defendant: Belk, Inc. and Belk Department Stores, LP
Case Number: 1:2021cv00150
Filed: June 28, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Katherine A Crytzer
Referring Judge: Christopher H Steger
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 26, 2021 Filing 18 AMENDED COMPLAINT Summons to against Belk Department Stores, LP., filed by Jamie Peeks.(Hahn, Madison)
August 13, 2021 Filing 17 NOTICE OF NONCONSENT by Belk, Inc. (Rutchow, William)
July 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting #15 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You MUST register as an E-Filer here: #https://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/pscof/regWizard.jsf. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher H Steger on 7-29-21. (KMG)
July 28, 2021 Filing 15 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Darius Walker, Jr. by Belk, Inc.. (Rutchow, William)
July 28, 2021 Clerk's Verification of PHV Requirements is complete regarding document: #15 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Darius Walker, Jr. filed by Belk, Inc. (AWS)
July 21, 2021 Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Belk, Inc.., filed by Jamie Peeks. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EEOC right to sue)(Pinchak, Frank)
July 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #10 Motion to Amend Complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1) provides a party may amend its pleading once as a matter of course within 21 days after serving it or, if the pleading is one to which a responsive pleading is required, 21 days after service of a responsive pleading or 21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f), whichever is earlier. Defendant answered the Complaint on July 6, 2021. Nine days later, Plaintiff moved to amend. Plaintiff may amend his complaint under Rule 15(a)(1). Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher H Steger on 7-21-21. This entry is the Order of the Court. There is no document attached. (KMG)
July 15, 2021 Filing 12 Certificate of Corporate Interest by Belk, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Bear Parent, Inc. for Belk, Inc.. (Rutchow, William)
July 15, 2021 Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #10 MOTION to Amend/Revise Complaint filed by Jamie Peeks. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Gulettt Initial Disclosures, #2 Exhibit Gulett Responses to Interrogatories)(Pinchak, Frank)
July 15, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION to Amend/Revise Complaint by Jamie Peeks. (Attachments: #1 Other proposed Amended Complaint)(Pinchak, Frank)
July 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 FILED IN ERROR-ORDER: The parties are ordered to confer and return the attached form within the time provided. Signed by District Judge Katherine A Crytzer on 7/7/2021. (AWS) Modified on 7/7/2021 (AWS).
July 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: The parties are ordered to confer and return the attached form within the time provided. Signed by District Judge Katherine A Crytzer on 7/7/2021. (Attachments: #1 Other Notice of Consent/Non-Consent) (AWS) Mailed to Darius Walker, Jr.
July 7, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Deficiency (Pro Hac) as to Darius Walker, Jr re #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL. PHV Requirements Deadline: 7/26/2021 (AWS) Mailed to Darius Walker, Jr.
July 7, 2021 NOTICE OF FAILURE TO FILE Certificate of Corporate Interest as required by FRCP 7.1 by Belk, Inc.. (AWS)
July 6, 2021 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Belk, Inc..(Rutchow, William)
June 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge Katherine A Crytzer on 6/29/21. (ABF)
June 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Katherine A Crytzer on 6/29/21. (ABF)
June 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge Katherine A Crytzer on 6/29/21. (ABF)
June 29, 2021 District Judge Katherine A Crytzer and Magistrate Judge Christopher H Steger added. (ABF)
June 28, 2021 Filing 2 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Notice of Removal, Civil Cover Sheet by Belk, Inc.. (Rutchow, William)
June 28, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hamilton County Chancery Court, case number 21-0376. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNEDC-4774381), filed by Belk, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal)(Rutchow, William)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peeks v. Belk, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Belk, Inc.
Represented By: William S Rutchow
Represented By: Darius Walker, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Belk Department Stores, LP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jamie Peeks
Represented By: Frank P Pinchak
Represented By: Harry F Burnette
Represented By: Madison L Hahn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?