Beard v. Hamilton County Sheriff's Department
| 1:2022cv00137 |
| June 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Chattanooga Office |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Plaintiff has failed to present a valid basis to reopen this action, and his motion to amend his complaint 7 is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Travis R. McDonough on 6/30/22. (c/m Terry J. Beard #528115 SILVERDALE HAMILTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER P O BOX 23148 CHATTANOOGA, TN 37422 ) (ADA)
|
|
Filing
6
JUDGMENT ORDER, this prisoner pro se complaint for violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is DISMISSED pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Because the Court CERTIFIED in the memorandum opinion that any appe al from this order would not be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Travis R. McDonough on 6/1/22. (c/m Terry J. Beard #528115 SILVERDALE HAMILTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER P O BOX 23148 CHATTANOOGA, TN 37422 and custodian of Plaintiffs inmate trust account)(ADA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Beard v. Hamilton County Sheriff's Department | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
