United States of America v. 9625 Church Street, Soddy Daisy, Tennessee 37379 et al
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 9625 Church Street, Soddy Daisy, Tennessee 37379 and 9627 Church Street, Soddy Daisy, Tennessee 37379
Case Number: 1:2022cv00192
Filed: July 19, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Travis R McDonough
Referring Judge: Christopher H Steger
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #5 Motion to Stay. The Government is ORDERED to file a motion to extend the stay on or by February 1, 2023. Signed by District Judge Travis R McDonough on 8/11/2022. (AML)
July 25, 2022 Filing 10 SEALED Document by United States of America. (AWS)
July 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher H Steger on 7/25/2022. (AWS)
July 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge Travis R McDonough on 7/20/2022. (AML)
July 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Travis R McDonough on 7/20/2022. (AML)
July 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge Travis R McDonough on 7/20/2022. (AML)
July 20, 2022 District Judge Travis R McDonough and Magistrate Judge Christopher H Steger added. (AML)
July 19, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION to Stay by United States of America. (Combs, Tammy)
July 19, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Lis Pendens by United States of America (Combs, Tammy)
July 19, 2022 Filing 3 SEALED Proposed Sealed Document re: #2 MOTION for Leave to File Document Under Seal by United States of America . (Combs, Tammy)
July 19, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to File Document Under Seal by United States of America. (Combs, Tammy)
July 19, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM against 9625 Church Street, Soddy Daisy, Tennessee 37379, 9627 Church Street, Soddy Daisy, Tennessee 37379, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Other / Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Other / Judge Atchley Certification Form)(Combs, Tammy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. 9625 Church Street, Soddy Daisy, Tennessee 37379 et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Tammy O Combs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 9625 Church Street, Soddy Daisy, Tennessee 37379
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 9627 Church Street, Soddy Daisy, Tennessee 37379
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?