Bartol v. Amazon.com.dedc.LLC
| Robert Bartol |
| Amazon.com.dedc, LLC |
| 1:2022cv00213 |
| August 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Katherine A Crytzer |
| Susan K Lee |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 TEXT ORDER granting #18 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time for Defendant to File Response to #16 Amended Complaint. By agreement of the parties and for good cause shown, Defendant shall have an extension to November 7, 2022, to respond to the Amended Complaint. This docket text entry constitutes the complete Order of the Court signed by United States Magistrate Judge Susan K. Lee. (Lee, Susan) |
| Filing 18 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #16 Amended Complaint by Amazon.com.dedc, LLC. (Smith, Mary) |
| Filing 17 STIPULATION re #16 Amended Complaint To Extend Defendant's Responsive Pleading Deadlineg by Amazon.com.dedc, LLC. (Smith, Mary) |
| Filing 16 AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against Amazon.com.dedc, LLC., filed by Robert Bartol.(Ferguson, Taylor) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Robert Bartol. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Defendant Merger, #2 Exhibit Services Docs, #3 Exhibit Other State Info)(Ferguson, Taylor) |
Filing 14
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file a response to this Order within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this Order with facts sufficient to show that this Court has jurisdiction over the case. A failure to respond will be grounds for the Court to dismiss this action. Signed by District Judge Katherine A Crytzer on 9/12/22. (ABF)
|
| Filing 13 TEXT ORDER granting #12 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. For good cause shown and without objection, the time for Defendant to file its response to Plaintiff's complaint is extended to September 30, 2022. This docket text entry constitutes the complete Order of the Court signed by United States Magistrate Judge Susan K. Lee. (RFH) |
| Filing 12 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Amazon.com.dedc, LLC. (Smith, Mary) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Taylor J. Ferguson on behalf of Plaintiff Robert Bartol. This entry constitutes the complete Order of the Court. There is no document attached to this entry. You MUST register as an E-Filer here: #https://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/pscof/regWizard.jsf. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 09/05/2022. (KRS)
|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Robert Bartol. Amazon.com.dedc, LLC served on 8/26/2022. (Ferguson, Taylor) |
| Clerk's Verification of PHV Requirements is complete regarding document: #2 Proposed MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 90 receipt number ATNEDC-5148456.) filed by Robert Bartol (BJL) |
| Filing 9 SUPPLEMENT to #2 Proposed MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 90 receipt number ATNEDC-5148456.) Certificate of Good Standing by Robert Bartol. (Ferguson, Taylor) |
|
Filing 8
Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information,Signed by District Judge Katherine A Crytzer on 8/22/2022. (BJL)
|
|
Filing 7
Order Governing Motions To Dismiss, Signed by District Judge Katherine A Crytzer on 8/22/2022. (BJL)
|
|
Filing 6
Order Governing Depositions, Signed by District Judge Katherine A Crytzer on 8/22/2022. (BJL)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Amazon.com.dedc, LLC. (BJL) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Deficiency (Pro Hac) re #2 Proposed MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice * A Certificate of Good Standing-USDC no older than 30 days should be filed as a supplement to the motion. (BJL) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Deficiency (PDF) re the Civil Cover Sheet and Summons to the #1 Complaint, (BJL) |
| Filing 2 Proposed MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 90 receipt number ATNEDC-5148456.) by Robert Bartol. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Ferguson, Taylor) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against Amazon.com.dedc.llc ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNEDC-5148444.), filed by Robert Bartol. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Ferguson, Taylor)(Attachment 1 replaced on 8/22/2022) (BJL). (Attachment 2 replaced on 8/22/2022) (BJL). Modified on 8/22/2022 (BJL). |
| District Judge Katherine A Crytzer and Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee added. (BJL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bartol v. Amazon.com.dedc.LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert Bartol | |
| Represented By: | Taylor J Ferguson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Amazon.com.dedc, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Mary Dohner Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
