Land v. Rose
Petitioner: Willard Land
Respondent: Sharon Rose
Interested Party: Tennessee Attorney General (Habeas)
Case Number: 1:2022cv00278
Filed: November 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Katherine A Crytzer
Referring Judge: Christopher H Steger
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 SUPPLEMENT to #13 Order, signature page as to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Willard Land. (KFB)
December 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Willard Land: the Court DIRECTS the Clerk to photocopy the signature page of Lands petition [Doc. 1 at 15] and return it to Petitioner Land. The Court ORDERS Petitioner Land to affix his handwritten signature to the document and return the signed document to the Court within fourteen (14) days of entry of this Order. Additionally, the Court ORDERS Petitioner Land to immediately inform the Court and Respondent of any address change in writing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.13, it is the duty of a pro se party to promptly notify the Clerk and the other parties to the proceedings of any change in his address, to monitor the progress of the case, and to prosecute or defend the action diligently. Signed by District Judge Katherine A Crytzer on 12/28/2022. (BJL)*Mailed this Order and a copy of document 1 at 15 (as directed in the order) to Willard Land 469456 NORTHWEST CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX 960 STATE ROUTE 212 TIPTONVILLE, TN 38079
December 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #11 MOTION to Dismiss TIME BARRED HABEAS CORPUS PETITION filed by Sharon Rose. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - 1-TSC Order on R11-CD)(Barker, Zachary)
December 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss TIME BARRED HABEAS CORPUS PETITION by Sharon Rose. (Barker, Zachary)
November 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER. Because it does not plainly appear from the face of the petition that the petition should be summarily dismissed, the Court ORDERS Respondent to answer or otherwise respond to the petition within forty-five (45) days of the date of this Order. Signed by District Judge Katherine A. Crytzer on 11/21/22. (c/m Willard Land 469456 NORTHWEST CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX 960 STATE ROUTE 212 TIPTONVILLE, TN 38079 ) (ADA)
November 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Notice Regarding Requirement to Notify Court of Change of Address. (c/m Willard Land 469456 NORTHWEST CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX 960 STATE ROUTE 212 TIPTONVILLE, TN 38079 ) (ADA)
November 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Case transferred in from District of Tennessee Western; Case Number 1:22-cv-01227.
November 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2241(d). Signed by Judge J. Daniel Breen on 11/14/22. (mbm) [Transferred from Tennessee Western on 11/14/2022.]
November 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Signed by Judge J. Daniel Breen on 11/9/22. (mbm) [Transferred from Tennessee Western on 11/14/2022.]
November 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Willard Land. (Attachments: #1 Trust Fund Statement, #2 envelope)(cdi) [Transferred from Tennessee Western on 11/14/2022.]
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE AN IN FORMA PAUPERIS AFFIDAVIT AND TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT OR PAY $5.00 HABEAS FILING FEE. Signed by Judge J. Daniel Breen on 10/25/22. (mbm) [Transferred from Tennessee Western on 11/14/2022.]
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Zachary Lewis Barker on behalf of Sharon Rose (Barker, Zachary) [Transferred from Tennessee Western on 11/14/2022.]
October 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (mbm) [Transferred from Tennessee Western on 11/14/2022.]
October 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PRO SE 2254 against Sharon Rose, filed by Willard Land. (Attachments: #1 TN Offender FaceSheet, #2 TOMIS sentencing ltr, #3 Trust fund info, #4 envelope, #5 Judge's card)(mbm) [Transferred from Tennessee Western on 11/14/2022.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Land v. Rose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Willard Land
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Sharon Rose
Represented By: Zachary Lewis Barker
Represented By: Zachary L Barker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Tennessee Attorney General (Habeas)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?