Ross v. Ables et al
| De'Lane Andre Ross |
| Larry Ables, Officer Emery, Ruth DeLange and Barbara Bradford |
| 1:2023cv00089 |
| April 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Clifton L Corker |
| Susan K Lee |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint by De'Lane Andre Ross. Summons received. (KFB) |
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by De'Lane Andre Ross. As for Plaintiffs IFP application [Doc. 2], there are gaps in information that make it impossible to determine whether Plaintiff is indigent. Nevertheless, given the recommendation that Plaintiffs claims be dismissed without further proceedings, I RECOMMEND his IFP application [Doc. 2] be DENIED AS MOOT and no filing fee assessed.Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 5/1/2023. (DJH) |
| Filing 3 Administrative Notice to Counsel requirements due by 5/1/2023. (DJH) Modified on 4/19/2023 (DJH). |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by De'Lane Andre Ross. (DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Larry Ables, Barbara Bradford, Ruth DeLange, Officer Emery (Filing fee $ 0.)(IFP filed), filed by De'Lane Andre Ross.(DJH) |
| Notice of Deficiency mailed to plaintiff De'Lane Andre Ross (DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
