Rollins v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
| Vince J Rollins |
| Norfolk Southern Railway Company |
| 1:2023cv00125 |
| June 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Curtis L Collier |
| Christopher H Steger |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Hearing: Scheduling Conference set for 8/24/2023 03:30 PM in Judge's Chambers (Telephonic Hearing) before District Judge Curtis L Collier. Parties must review the attached notice. Call-in information will be circulated by email. (CBS) |
| Filing 11 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Stone, Amy) |
| Filing 10 Certificate of Corporate Interest by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Allen, Craig) Modified on 7/5/2023 (BJL). Added Corporate Parent - Norfolk Southern Corporation to Norfolk Southern Railway Company Role - dft |
Filing 9
ORDER: The parties are ordered to confer and return the attached form within the time provided.Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 6/29/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent/Non Consent) (BJL)
|
| NOTICE OF FAILURE TO FILE Certificate of Corporate Interest as required by FRCP 7.1 by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (BJL) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Norfolk Southern Railway Company.(Allen, Craig) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Craig R Allen on behalf of Norfolk Southern Railway Company (Allen, Craig) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and complaint served on Norfolk Southern Railway Company on 6/8/2023, filed by Vince J Rollins. (Stone, Amy) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (DJH) |
|
Filing 4
Order Governing Sealing Confidential InformationSigned by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 6/7/2023. (DJH)
|
|
Filing 3
Order Governing Motions To DismissSigned by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 6/7/2023. (DJH)
|
|
Filing 2
Order Governing DepositionsSigned by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 6/7/2023. (DJH)
|
| District Judge Curtis L Collier and Magistrate Judge Christopher H Steger added. (DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Norfolk Southern Railway Company ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNEDC-5388981.), filed by Vince J Rollins. (Attachments: #1 Other Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons)(Stone, Amy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rollins v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Vince J Rollins | |
| Represented By: | Amy Lorrelle Stone |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin T. Reese |
| Represented By: | Craig R Allen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
