Kyle et al v. Garrett

Kyle et al v. Garrett

Case Number:	1:2023cv00171
Filed:	August 22, 2023
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office:	Chattanooga Office
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 4, 2023	Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Accordingly, Plaintiff will be ASSESSED the filing fee of $402.00, and this action will be DISMISSED. All pending motions will be DENIED as moot. The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal from this action would no t be taken in good faith and would be totally frivolous. An Appropriate Judgment Order Will Enter. Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 10/4/2023. (AML) Emailed to Court Financial Deputy and Mailed to Lowell H. Kyle, Sr. and Walker County GA Jail Inmate Account Manager
August 22, 2023	Filing 13 MEMORANDUM & ORDER, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs request for class certification. Plaintiffs Colton Clingan, Larry Fowler, Michael Jones, Kendrell Goodwin, Andre Collier, Arnellus Jackson, JaDavione Danzy, and Keenan Cooley be DISMI SSED from this action without prejudice. Plaintiff Goodwins motion to proceed in forma pauperis 10 is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff Kyle has clearly indicated his desire to initiate this civil action given he submitted a personally si gned Complaint and submitted a motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Docs. 2 , 11 ]. Plaintiff Kyle shall have thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this Order to pay the full filing fee or to submit the necessary documents. Signed by District Judge Curtis L. Collier on 8/22/23. (c/m Lowell H Kyle, Sr WALKER COUNTY JAIL 105 SOUTH DUKE STREET LAFAYETTE, GA 30728 with account form and Clingan, Fowler, Jones, Goodwin, Collier, Jackson, Danzy, and Cooley with 1983 form)(ADA)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 4, 2023

Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Accordingly, Plaintiff will be ASSESSED the filing fee of $402.00, and this action will be DISMISSED. All pending motions will be DENIED as moot. The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal from this action would no t be taken in good faith and would be totally frivolous. An Appropriate Judgment Order Will Enter. Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 10/4/2023. (AML) Emailed to Court Financial Deputy and Mailed to Lowell H. Kyle, Sr. and Walker County GA Jail Inmate Account Manager

August 22, 2023

Filing 13 MEMORANDUM & ORDER, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs request for class certification. Plaintiffs Colton Clingan, Larry Fowler, Michael Jones, Kendrell Goodwin, Andre Collier, Arnellus Jackson, JaDavione Danzy, and Keenan Cooley be DISMI SSED from this action without prejudice. Plaintiff Goodwins motion to proceed in forma pauperis 10 is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff Kyle has clearly indicated his desire to initiate this civil action given he submitted a personally si gned Complaint and submitted a motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Docs. 2 , 11 ]. Plaintiff Kyle shall have thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this Order to pay the full filing fee or to submit the necessary documents. Signed by District Judge Curtis L. Collier on 8/22/23. (c/m Lowell H Kyle, Sr WALKER COUNTY JAIL 105 SOUTH DUKE STREET LAFAYETTE, GA 30728 with account form and Clingan, Fowler, Jones, Goodwin, Collier, Jackson, Danzy, and Cooley with 1983 form)(ADA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kyle et al v. Garrett
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?