Dove v. Transam Trucking, Inc. et al
| Jeanean Dove |
| Transam Trucking, Inc. and Shayne Osborne |
| 1:2023cv00188 |
| August 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Katherine A Crytzer |
| Susan K Lee |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
JUDGMENT: In the Order Dismissing Action [Doc. 13] the Court DISMISSED this action. Accordingly, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk to close this case.Signed by District Judge Katherine A Crytzer on 10/16/23. (ABF)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION. Signed by District Judge Katherine A Crytzer on 10/16/23. (ABF)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER. On September 18, 2023, the Parties filed a "Response of Defendants to Court's Order to Show Cause," satisfying the Court that it has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332 [Doc. 11]. In the filing, Defendant indicated that "the parties have just reached a settlement of this matter and will be submitting a stipulation of dismissal shortly" [Id. at 2]. In accordance with Local Rule 68.1, the Parties SHALL file an agreed stipulation under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) or submit an agreed order of dismissal under E.D. Tenn. ECF Rule 4.8 within twenty-one (21) days of this Order. If Parties fail to comply with this Order, or any extension that the Court may grant, the Court will dismiss this action based on the Parties' representations to the Court that the matter has settled. Signed by District Judge Katherine A. Crytzer on 09/19/2023. This docket entry constitutes the complete order of the Court. (MJN) (Entered:09/19/2023)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Transam Trucking, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Tarpley, John) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The Court ORDERS Defendant "TransAm Trucking, Inc." to file a response to this Order on or before 9/24/2023, with facts sufficient to show that this Court has jurisdiction over the case. A failure to respond will be grounds for the Court to remand this action. Signed by District Judge Katherine A Crytzer on September 8, 2023. (AYB)
|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Shayne Osborne.(Tarpley, John) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Transam Trucking, Inc..(Tarpley, John) |
|
Filing 7
Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge Katherine A Crytzer on 8/28/2023. (LCK)
|
|
Filing 6
Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Katherine A Crytzer on 8/28/2023. (LCK)
|
|
Filing 5
Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge Katherine A Crytzer on 8/28/2023. (LCK)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Deficiency (PDF) re #1 Notice of Removal - Civil Cover Sheet. (LCK) |
| District Judge Katherine A Crytzer and Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee added. (LCK) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Corporate Interest by Transam Trucking, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Jacobsen Holdings, Inc. for Transam Trucking, Inc.. (Tarpley, John) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Citizenship by Transam Trucking, Inc.. (Tarpley, John) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hamilton County Circuit Court, case number 23C739. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNEDC-5456332), filed by Transam Trucking, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A- Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex. B- Notice to Plaintiff's Attorney & Notice to State Court, #3 Other Civil Cover Sheet)(Tarpley, John) (Attachment 3 replaced on 8/28/2023) (LCK). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
