Parks v. Deibel Laboratories of Tennessee, LLC et al
| Kristian Parks |
| Deibel Laboratories of Tennessee, LLC and Colleen M Scarbrough |
| 1:2023cv00309 |
| December 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Charles E Atchley |
| Christopher H Steger |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information.Signed by District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr on December 27, 2023. (SAC)
|
|
Filing 4
Order Governing Motions To Dismiss.Signed by District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr on December 27, 2023. (SAC)Order mailed to Parks.
|
|
Filing 3
Order Governing Depositions.Signed by District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr on December 27, 2023. (SAC)Order mailed to Parks.
|
| Filing 2 Notice Regarding Requirement to Notify Court of Change of Address. (SAC)Notice mailed to Parks. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Deibel Laboratories of Tennessee, LLC, Colleen M Scarbrough (Filing fee $ 405 paid.), filed by Kristian Parks. (Attachments: #1 Notice of EEOC, #2 receipt)(SAC) . |
| No summons received with initiating documents. Therefore, summons not issued as to Deibel Laboratories of Tennessee, LLC, Colleen M Scarbrough. (SAC)Note: Summons were given to plaintiff at intake counter. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
