Edgar v. Apple, Inc. et al
| Charles Edgar |
| Apple, Inc. and Sedgwick |
| 1:2024cv00115 |
| March 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Charles E Atchley |
| Susan K Lee |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information, Signed by District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr on 03/13/2024. (BJL)*Mailed to Charles Edgar 1149 Ridgetop Drive Chattanooga, TN 37421
|
|
Filing 4
Order Governing Motions To Dismiss, Signed by District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr on 3/13/2024. (BJL)*Mailed to Charles Edgar 1149 Ridgetop Drive Chattanooga, TN 37421
|
|
Filing 3
Order Governing Depositions,Signed by District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr on 3/13/2024. (BJL)*Mailed to Charles Edgar 1149 Ridgetop Drive Chattanooga, TN 37421
|
| Filing 2 Notice Regarding Requirement to Notify Court of Change of Address (BJL)*Mailed to Charles Edgar 1149 Ridgetop Drive Chattanooga, TN 37421 |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Sedgwick (Filing fee $ 405.00, receipt no. 100000999), filed by Charles Edgar. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BJL) |
| No summons received with initiating documents. Therefore, summons not issued as to Apple, Inc., Sedgwick.. (BJL)*Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) mailed to Charles Edgar 1149 Ridgetop Drive Chattanooga, TN 37421 |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
