Barnett et al v. Adman Electric, Inc.
| Jacob Barnett, Lance Bolton, Benjamin Davis, Chandler Gonzalez, Nicklus Hullander, Reginald McCalaster, Matthew Roenneburg, Samuel Tatrow and James Hayden Ware |
| Adman Electric, Inc. |
| 1:2024cv00150 |
| April 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Curtis L Collier |
| Susan K Lee |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Reginald McCalaster, Benjamin Davis, Matthew Roenneburg, James Hayden Ware, Lance Bolton, Samuel Tatrow, Jacob Barnett, Chandler Gonzalez, Nicklus Hullander. All Defendants. (Gibbons, Link) |
Filing 5
Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 4/12/2024. (MKM)
|
|
Filing 4
Order Governing Motions To Dismiss Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 4/12/2024. (MKM)
|
|
Filing 3
Order Governing Depositions Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 4/12/2024. (MKM)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Adman Electric, Inc. (MKM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Adman Electric, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATNEDC-5647899.), filed by Jacob Barnett. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Sec. of State Info. on Defendant, #2 Exhibit Consent Forms, #3 Summons Summons, #4 Other Civil Cover Sheet)(Young, Katherine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
