State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. RoMar Construction Co
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company |
Romar Construction Co and RoMar Construction Co. |
1:2024cv00158 |
April 23, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Charles E Atchley |
Susan K Lee |
Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Durr, Michael) |
Filing 16 ORDER granting #15 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply regarding Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. For good cause shown and lack of opposition, Plaintiff's Response is due on or before June 24, 2024.Signed by District Judge Charles E. Atchley, Jr. on 6/7/2024. (GMS) |
Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. (Durr, Michael) |
Filing 14 NOTICE by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company Service of Proposed Rule 26(f) Report and Proposed Discovery Plan (Durr, Michael) |
Filing 13 NOTICE by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company Service of Interrogatories and Requests for Production on Defendant Romar Construction (Durr, Michael) |
Filing 12 ORDER. The parties are ORDERED to confer and develop a discovery plan. The parties must file a written report outlining the discovery plan no later than 21 days from the date of this Order. Counsel for all parties are instructed to discuss with their clients the possibility of consenting to the exercise of a magistrate judges authority in this action. Signed by District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr on 5/28/2024. (MKM) Modified text on 5/28/2024 (MKM). |
Filing 11 ORDER: The parties are ordered to confer and return the attached form within the time provided. Signed by District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr on 5/28/2024. (Attachments: #1 Other Consent Form) (MKM) Modified text on 5/28/2024 (MKM). |
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by RoMar Construction Co.. (Evans, Matthew) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss by RoMar Construction Co.. (Evans, Matthew) |
Filing 8 NOTICE by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company of (1) Service of Process and (2) Serving Initial Disclosures (Durr, Michael) |
Filing 7 Certificate of Corporate Interest by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. (Durr, Michael) |
Filing 6 Certificate of Citizenship by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. (Durr, Michael) |
Filing 5 Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr on 4/24/2024. (LCK) |
Filing 4 Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr on 4/24/2024. (LCK) |
Filing 3 Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr on 4/24/2024. (LCK) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to RoMar Construction Co.. (LCK) |
NOTICE OF FAILURE TO FILE Certificate of Corporate Interest as required by FRCP 7.1 by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. (LCK) |
NOTICE OF FAILURE TO FILE Certificate of Citizenship in a diversity case as required by FRCP 7.1 by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. (LCK) |
District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr and Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee added. (LCK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATNEDC-5656513.), filed by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Other Civil Cover Sheet)(Durr, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.