Stalley v. Wellmont Health Systems, Inc. et al
2:2006cv00217 |
September 15, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Greeneville Office |
Curtis L Collier |
Dennis H Inman |
Contract: Recovery Medicare |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 67 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, ORDER re 65 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 47 MOTION for Sanctions filed by Wellmont Health Systems, Inc. For the foregoing reasons, the Court REMANDS this case for the Magistrate Judge to conduct a hearing to determine the appropriateness of sanctions and, if they are appropriate, how Defendants' fees were calculated. Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 1/5/09. (KDO) |
Filing 65 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 47 MOTION for Sanctions filed by Wellmont Health Systems, Inc. It is respectfully recommended to the court, that Mr. Stalley and his attorney, jointly and severally, be ordered to pay the attorneys' fees and relat ed expenses incurred by the defendants in their defense of these cases through the trial level: $152,472.36 to Wellmont Health System and $146,443.85 to Mountain States Health Alliance.Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis H Inman on 9/23/08. (KDO) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Stalley v. Wellmont Health Systems, Inc. et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.