Conagra Foods, Inc. v. United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Eastern District Conagra Foods, Inc. v. United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union

Conagra Foods, Inc. v. United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union

Plaintiff:	Conagra Foods, Inc.
Defendant:	United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union
Case Number:	2:2010cv00076
Filed:	April 9, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office:	Greeneville Office
County:	Cocke
Presiding Judge:	J Ronnie Greer
Presiding Judge:	Dennis H Inman
Nature of Suit:	Labor/Management Relations
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 185
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 15, 2011	Filing 32 ORDER denying 31 Request for Oral Argument ; It is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiffs objections are OVERRULED. It is further ORDERED that this Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and APPROVED, [Doc. 28], with the modifications s et forth above. It is also ORDERED that plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, [Doc. 16], be DENIED and that defendants Motion for Summary Judgment, [Doc. 18], be GRANTED to the extent that this Court ORDERS that the Arbitrators Award be enforced promptly but DENIED to the extent that United Steelworkers requests an award of prejudgment interest on behalf of Mr. Cheek. See order for details. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 2/15/2011. (RLC, )

Date Filed

Document Text

February 15, 2011

Filing 32 ORDER denying 31 Request for Oral Argument ; It is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiffs objections are OVERRULED. It is further ORDERED that this Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and APPROVED, [Doc. 28], with the modifications s et forth above. It is also ORDERED that plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, [Doc. 16], be DENIED and that defendants Motion for Summary Judgment, [Doc. 18], be GRANTED to the extent that this Court ORDERS that the Arbitrators Award be enforced promptly but DENIED to the extent that United Steelworkers requests an award of prejudgment interest on behalf of Mr. Cheek. See order for details. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 2/15/2011. (RLC, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Conagra Foods, Inc. v. United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Conagra Foods, Inc.
Represented By:	Hillary L Klein
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?