Jones v. Sexton et al
Petitioner: Daniel H Jones
Respondent: David Sexton and State of Tennessee
Case Number: 2:2010cv00261
Filed: December 2, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office: Greeneville Office
County: Johnson
Presiding Judge: J Ronnie Greer
Presiding Judge: Dennis H Inman
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION: After carefully reviewing the entire record, the Court finds it unnecessary to hold an evidentiary hearing and, thus, will DENY petitioners motion for a hearing, [Doc. 15]. Petitioner is not entitled to habeas co rpus relief and, for that reason, the writ of habeas corpus will be DENIED and this petition will be DISMISSED. No COA will issue because petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). An appropriate order will enter. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 3/19/2012. (c/m to pro se petitioner) (RLC, )
February 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Daniel H Jones; The Court FINDS that the claims asserted in the petition have been exhausted and, thus, DENIES respondent's motion to dismiss, [Doc. 10]. M otions DENIED: 10 MOTION to Dismiss filed by David Sexton. Accordingly, petitioner shall have twenty days from the date on this order to amend his petition to set forth, clearly and concisely, the specific facts which illustrate the claims offered for habeas corpus relief. If petitioner submits an amended petition, correcting the noted deficiencies, respondent SHALL file an answer to the amended petition within thirty (30) days of the date of entry of this order. If petitioner chooses to let h is claims stand as they have been offered and does not file an amended petition within the thirty day time-frame, respondent SHALL answer the original petition. In that event, the Court will review each claim in its present form and resolve the claim as it has been presented. Any reply to the answer SHALL be filed within thirty days from the date the answer is filed. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 2/2/2012. (c/m to pro se petitioner) (RLC, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Sexton et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Daniel H Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David Sexton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Tennessee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?