Jarnigan v. Johnson
Petitioner: Shannon Lee Jarnigan
Respondent: Debra Johnson
Case Number: 2:2012cv00205
Filed: May 14, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office: Greeneville Office
County: Hamblen
Presiding Judge: William B Carter
Presiding Judge: Harry S Mattice
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION: this pro se state prisoner's application for a writ of habeas corpus will be DENIED and this case will be DISMISSED. Because Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a COA will not issue. Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 8/17/2015. (BJL, )***Mailed to Shannon Lee Jarnigan.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jarnigan v. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Shannon Lee Jarnigan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Debra Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?