Bartlett v. Grindstaff

Plaintiff: Michael Paul Bartlett, Jr
Defendant: April Grindstaff
Case Number: 2:2013cv00168
Filed: June 19, 2013
Court: Tennessee Eastern District Court
Office: Greeneville Office
County: Carter
Presiding Judge: J Ronnie Greer
Referring Judge: Dennis H Inman
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 4, 2013 5 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Accordingly, plaintiff is ASSESSED the full civil filing fee of $350. By separate order, this action will be DISMISSED for want of prosecution under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (C/M to Pro Se Litigant). Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 12/4/2013. (LMC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bartlett v. Grindstaff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Paul Bartlett, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: April Grindstaff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.