Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC v. Clemens
| Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC |
| Melissa Clemens |
| Melissa Clemens |
| Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC |
| 2:2013cv00239 |
| September 19, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Greeneville Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| J Ronnie Greer |
| Dennis H Inman |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, ( Status Report due by 2/4/2014.), GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART: 5 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction and Order Compelling Arbitration filed by Fid elity Brokerage Services LLC. After balancing all the necessary factors, the Court concludes, for the reasons set forth above, that the preliminary injunction requested by the petitioner prohibiting Clemens from using confidential information or soli citing Fidelitys customers should enter. Because this matter will proceed to arbitration, it is further ORDERED that further proceedings in this case are STAYED pending the arbitration. The plaintiff shall file a status report within ninety (90) days of the entry of this order as to the status of the arbitration. See Order for details. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 11/4/2013. C/M to Attorney Schmidt of Order and ECF Registration Letter. (LMC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
