Singleton et al v. Mossman et al (JRG2)
| Jason Singleton and Scherry Singleton |
| Michael I Mossman and Jane Doe |
| 2:2015cv00287 |
| October 27, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Greeneville Office |
| Hamblen |
| Clifton L Corker |
| J Ronnie Greer |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: To the extent that the motion to dismiss, [Doc. 25], and the motion for judgment on the pleadings, [Doc. 36], move to dismiss the Amended Complaint, the motions are GRANTED. In sum, all claims alleged in the Amended Complaint, [Doc. 6 in 2:15-CV-290], are DISMISSED. Neither of the dispositive motions discussed dismissal of the state law claim of invasion of privacy or the FDCPA violations for improper communication with a third-party alleged in t he complaint filed in 2:15-CV-287. [Doc. 1-1]. To the extent that the dispositive motions address these allegations, it is with nothing more than a cursory statement, if at all, and the motions are DENIED. The allegations made in the complaint, [Doc. 1-1], for invasion of privacy and improper communication with a third-party in violation of the FDCPA are the only remaining claims in either of these consolidated cases. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 12/14/2016. Associated Cases: 2:15-cv-00287-JRG-MCLC, 2:15-cv-00290-JRG-MCLC (AMP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
