North American Specialty Insurance Company v. Heritage Glass, LLC et al (JRG2)
Plaintiff: North American Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant: Heritage Glass, LLC, Daniel Victor Davis and Thomas Eric Kerney
Case Number: 2:2016cv00263
Filed: August 4, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office: Greeneville Office
County: Sullivan
Presiding Judge: Clifton L Corker
Presiding Judge: J Ronnie Greer
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 178 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER: Based on the above findings and conclusions, it is ORDERED that the Third-Party Plaintiff, Daniel Victor Davis, is entitled to contribution from the Third-Party Defendant, Christopher R. Cording, in the amount of $300,000. The Third-Party Defendants counterclaim for contribution is DISMISSED AS MOOT. Davis shall file his brief regarding his request for an award of reasonable attorneys' fees and out of pocket expenses incurred in this case on or before September 6, 2019. Thereafter, the defendant shall have ten (10) days from the filing of the plaintiffs brief to file his response. The Court will not consider any Reply brief on this issue, and no oral argument will be entertained. A final Judgment shall enter after this Court has ruled on these collateral issues. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 08/27/2019. (CAT)
January 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER granting 18 Motion for Default Judgment; granting 19 Motion for Default Judgment; adopting and approving Report and Recommendations re 31 Report and Recommendations. Defendants Heritage Glass, LLC and Thomas Kerney s hall be jointly and severally liable to the plaintiff in the amount of $750,000.00 and $14,774.76 in attorney fees, for a total amount of $764,774.76 plus post-judgment interest. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 01/31/2017. (C/M to Thomas Kerney and Heritage Glass, LLC, using the address provided on the certificate of service in the application for default) (AMP)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: North American Specialty Insurance Company v. Heritage Glass, LLC et al (JRG2)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: North American Specialty Insurance Company
Represented By: James Stephen King
Represented By: Elizabeth B Stengel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Heritage Glass, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Victor Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Eric Kerney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?