Jordan v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff: Betty Susan Jordan
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2016cv00322
Filed: October 18, 2016
Court: Tennessee Eastern District Court
Office: Greeneville Office
County: Hawkins
Referring Judge: Clifton L Corker
Presiding Judge: Harry S Mattice
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42:427
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 5, 2018 18 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 13 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting 15 Motion for Summary Judgment; accepting and adopting 17 Report and Recommendations. This action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 1/5/2018. (AML, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jordan v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Betty Susan Jordan
Represented By: David N Darnell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?