Long v. Westbrooks
Petitioner: Russell Dean Long
Respondent: Bruce Westbrooks
Case Number: 2:2017cv00063
Filed: April 20, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office: Greeneville Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Clifton L Corker
Presiding Judge: Pamela L Reeves
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION as set in following order. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 8/9/19. (c/m to Russell Dean Long #494757, Riverbend Maximum Security Institution, 7475 Cockrill Bend Boulevard, Nashville, TN 37209)(ABF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Long v. Westbrooks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Russell Dean Long
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Bruce Westbrooks
Represented By: Meredith Wood Bowen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?