Lindsey v. Corizion Medical Staff et al
| Jakeil D Lindsey |
| Corizion Medical Staff, Bledsoe County Correction Complex Security, Russell Melton, Tina Heard, Johnathan Holland and William Lewis |
| 2:2017cv00112 |
| July 12, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Greeneville Office |
| Bledsoe |
| Curtis L Collier |
| Clifton L Corker |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM. This action will be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(b). Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 7/2/2018. (AML, ) Copy of Memorandum mailed to Jakeil Lindsey.
|
|
Filing
3
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be GRANTED. Plaintiff will be ASSESSED the civil filing fee of $350.00. Corizion Medical Staff and Bledsoe County Correction Complex Secur ity are DISMISSED as defendants in this action. Plaintiff's allegations cannot proceed against Russell Melton, Tina Heard, Johnathan Holland and William Lewis in their official capacities and are DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 11/7/2017. (AML, ) Copy of M/O mailed to Inmate Account Custodian and emailed to Court Financial Deputy. Copy of M/O mailed to Plaintiff, along with four (4) service packets to be filled out and returned.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
