Berkley Regional Insurance Company v. Greater Eastern Credit Union (TV2)

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Eastern District Berkley Regional Insurance Company v. Greater Eastern Credit Union (TV2)

Berkley Regional Insurance Company v. Greater Eastern Credit Union (TV2)

Plaintiff:	Berkley Regional Insurance Company
Defendant:	Greater Eastern Credit Union
Case Number:	2:2018cv00077
Filed:	May 16, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office:	Greeneville Office
County:	Washington
Presiding Judge:	Clifton L Corker
Presiding Judge:	Thomas A Varlan
Nature of Suit:	Insurance
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 21, 2020	Filing 90 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth above, the Court shall GRANT in part and DENY in part Berkley's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and GRANT in part and DENY in part Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The Financial Institution Bond, No. CUP 6008984-11 is DECLARED and ADJUDGED rescinded and is null and void ab initio. GECU's counterclaims of Breach of Contract and Bad Faith are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. GECU's counterclaim for Interpleader is hereby DISMISSED as moot. Berkley's claims for Reverse Bad Faith and Attorney's Fees and Costs are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to release the funds to GECU that were interpleaded into the Registry of the Court according to the Order of Disbursal filed herewith. Signed by District Judge Clifton L Corker on 02/21/2020. (AMP)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 21, 2020

Filing 90 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth above, the Court shall GRANT in part and DENY in part Berkley's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and GRANT in part and DENY in part Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The Financial Institution Bond, No. CUP 6008984-11 is DECLARED and ADJUDGED rescinded and is null and void ab initio. GECU's counterclaims of Breach of Contract and Bad Faith are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. GECU's counterclaim for Interpleader is hereby DISMISSED as moot. Berkley's claims for Reverse Bad Faith and Attorney's Fees and Costs are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to release the funds to GECU that were interpleaded into the Registry of the Court according to the Order of Disbursal filed herewith. Signed by District Judge Clifton L Corker on 02/21/2020. (AMP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Berkley Regional Insurance Company v. Greater Eastern Credit Union (TV2)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Berkley Regional Insurance Company
Represented By:	C Adam Brinkley
Represented By:	Scott R Brown
Represented By:	Michael Keeley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Greater Eastern Credit Union
Represented By:	Mark S Dessauer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?