Parker v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
| Donna Michelle Parker |
| Social Security Administration, Commissioner of |
| SSA Office of General Counsel |
| 2:2018cv00106 |
| July 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Greeneville Office |
| Washington |
| Clifton L Corker |
| Harry S Mattice |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE re IFP Service re #4 Summons Issued as to USA. (AMP) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons Office of General Counsel, #2 Summons U.S. Attorney) (AMP) |
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Clifton L Corker on 07/10/2018. (AMP)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Donna Michelle Parker. (Arnold, Joey) |
| Filing 1 SSA COMPLAINT against Social Security, Commissioner of, filed by Donna Michelle Parker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Attorney General of the United States, U. S. Attorney and Office of the General Counsel)(Arnold, Joey) |
| District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr and Magistrate Judge Clifton L Corker added. (CAT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
