Carrick v. Wellmont Health System et al
Sara Carrick |
Ballad Health and Wellmont Health System |
2:2019cv00109 |
June 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Harry S Mattice |
Christopher H Steger |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Magistrate Judge Christopher H Steger added. Magistrate Judge M Clifton L Corker no longer assigned to case pursuant to SO-19-13. (CNC) |
Filing 6 Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 06/26/2019. (CAT) |
Filing 5 Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 06/26/2019. (CAT) |
Filing 4 Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 06/26/2019. (CAT) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ballad Health, Wellmont Health System. (Attachments: #1 Summons Ballad Health) (CAT) |
Filing 2 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint Civil Cover Sheet by Sara Carrick. (DeVault, Charlton) |
District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr and Magistrate Judge Clifton L Corker added. (CAT) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0649-4007850.), filed by Sara Carrick. (Attachments: #1 Summons to Wellmont Health System, #2 Summons to Ballad Health)(DeVault, Charlton) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.