Aistrop v. Contour Mortgage Corporation et al (PLR2)
| Lora Aistrop |
| Tony Huff and Contour Mortgage Corporation |
| 2:2019cv00171 |
| October 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Pamela L Reeves |
| Cynthia R Wyrick |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint Civil Cover Sheet by Lora Aistrop. (Morton, Jennifer) |
| Filing 5 Administrative Notice to Jennifer B Morton: Cover sheet not included. Please file a Civil Cover Sheet pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. Requirements due by 10/15/2019. (JBR) |
Filing 4
Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 10/8/19. (JBR)
|
|
Filing 3
Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 10/8/19. (JBR)
|
|
Filing 2
Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 10/8/19. (JBR)
|
| District Judge Pamela L Reeves and Magistrate Judge Cynthia R Wyrick added. (JBR) |
| No summons received with initiating documents. Therefore, summons not issued as to Contour Mortgage Corporation. (JBR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0649-4098287.), filed by Lora Aistrop.(Morton, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
