Behney v. Walmart Stores East, LP
Plaintiff: Maritza Behney
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. and Walmart Stores East, LP
Case Number: 2:2019cv00201
Filed: November 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Harry S Mattice
Referring Judge: Cynthia R Wyrick
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 2, 2020 Filing 14 NOTICE OF NONCONSENT of the parties filed by Walmart Stores East, LP (Callaway, Gregory)
December 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 SCHEDULING ORDER: Jury Trial set for 6/1/2021 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 - Chattanooga before District Judge Harry S Mattice Jr. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/17/2021 04:00 PM in Courtroom 3 - Chattanooga before District Judge Harry S Mattice Jr.Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 12/17/19. (AWS)
December 16, 2019 Filing 12 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Callaway, Gregory)
December 12, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE by Maritza Behney Substitution of Counsel (Doolan, Jonathan)
December 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER : Local Rule 83.5(b) requires attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Eastern District of Tennessee to file a motion for admission pro hac vice before proceeding in the case. Attorney Sarah M. Booher did not file the required motion upon initiation of this matter with the Court. The Clerk issued a Notice of Deficiency Pro Hac Vice [Doc. 6] on November 13, 2019, notifying counsel that she is not admitted to practice in this District in accordance with LR 83.5(b) and that the matter would be referred to the undersigned if an admission motion was not filed within 15 days. 28 days have passed since the Clerk's office issued the Notice of Deficiency and counsel has not complied with the Clerk's directive. Therefore, if Sarah M. Booher, Esq., has not moved for admission pro hac vice and otherwise complied with LR 83.5(b) on or before Monday, December 16, 2019, Ms. Booher shall be removed as counsel of record herein and will be prohibited from practicing in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia R Wyrick on 12/10/2019. (Copy of Order mailed to Sarah M. Booher) (CAT)
November 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: The parties are ordered to confer and return the attached form within the time provided. Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 11/21/2019. (Copy of Order and Consent/Non-Consent mailed to Sarah Booher) (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent / Non Consent) (CAT)
November 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 11/21/2019. (KTC)
November 20, 2019 Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Walmart Stores East, LP.(Callaway, Gregory)
November 13, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Deficiency (Pro Hac) for Sarah M Booher. Attorney is not admitted (See LR 83.5). This matter will be referred to a magistrate judge if a pro hac motion is not filed within 15 days of this Notice. (copy mailed to Sarah Booher) (JBR)
November 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 11/13/19. (JBR) Modified to reflect copy mailed to Sarah Booher on 11/13/2019 (JBR).
November 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 11/13/19. (JBR) Modified to reflect copy mailed to Sarah Booher on 11/13/2019 (JBR).
November 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 11/13/19. (JBR) Modified to reflect copy mailed to Sarah Booher on 11/13/2019 (JBR).
November 13, 2019 District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr and Magistrate Judge Cynthia R Wyrick added. (JBR)
November 12, 2019 Filing 2 Certificate of Corporate Interest by Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. identifying Corporate Parent Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. for Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Other attachment to business entity disclosure)(Callaway, Gregory)
November 12, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Cocke County, TN, case number 35,503-III. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0649-4129766), filed by Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit summons, #2 Exhibit complaint, #3 Other civil cover sheet)(Callaway, Gregory)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Behney v. Walmart Stores East, LP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Represented By: Gregory W Callaway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walmart Stores East, LP
Represented By: Gregory W Callaway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maritza Behney
Represented By: Jonathan William Doolan
Represented By: Sarah M Booher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?