Helton v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Plaintiff: Ronda Sue Helton
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Case Number: 2:2019cv00222
Filed: December 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Clifton L Corker
Referring Judge: H Bruce Guyton
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 16, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE re IFP Service (Attorney Representation) (ABF)
January 16, 2020 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Summons US Attorney, #2 Summons US Attorney General)(ABF)
January 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS ORDERED that the clerk issue summons and the United States Marshal, or the plaintiff, shall serve a copy of the complaint, summons, and this order upon all defendant(s) as directed by the plaintiff. If the United States Marshal provides the service, all costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. If the plaintiff provides his/her own service, the plaintiff will bear their own costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on 1/16/20. (ABF)
January 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE - Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 137 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby ORDERED that the above referenced case is REASSIGNED to the Honorable Clifton L. Corker, United States District Judge, for all further proceedings. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 1/13/2020. (KMK)
January 13, 2020 District Judge Clifton L Corker added. District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr no longer assigned to case. (KMK)
December 19, 2019 District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr and Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton added. (AWS)
December 18, 2019 Filing 2 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Ronda Sue Helton. (Smith, Harry)
December 18, 2019 Filing 1 SSA COMPLAINT Complaint against Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, filed by Ronda Sue Helton. (Attachments: #1 Other Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons US Attorney General, #3 Summons General Counsel, #4 Summons US Attorney)(Smith, Harry)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Helton v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronda Sue Helton
Represented By: Harry J Smith
Represented By: Mark Albert Skelton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?