Stokely v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Tina Yvette Stokely |
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of |
SSA Office of General Counsel |
2:2020cv00252 |
December 3, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Curtis L Collier |
Cynthia R Wyrick |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tina Yvette Stokely. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of served on 12/7/2020. (Smith, Harry) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tina Yvette Stokely. SSA Office of General Counsel served on 12/15/2020. (Smith, Harry) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tina Yvette Stokely. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of served on 12/10/2020. (Smith, Harry) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons US Attorney General, #2 Summons US Attorney's Office)(AWS) |
Filing 1 SSA COMPLAINT Complaint against Social Security Administration, Commissioner of ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNEDC-4576781.), filed by Tina Yvette Stokely. (Attachments: #1 Other Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons US Attorney General, #3 Summons General Counsel, #4 Summons US Attorney)(Smith, Harry) |
District Judge Curtis L Collier and Magistrate Judge Cynthia R Wyrick added. (AWS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.