Ramey v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cynthia Ray Ramey |
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of |
SSA Office of General Counsel |
2:2021cv00008 |
January 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Clifton L Corker |
Christopher H Steger |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE re IFP Service (Attorney Representation) re #4 Summons Issued as to USA. (AMP) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons General Counsel, #2 Summons U.S. Attorney) (AMP) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis for good cause shown. The Clerk of Court shall issue to Plaintiff the appropriate service packet. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher H Steger on 1-25-21. This entry is the complete order of the Court. There is no document attached. (KMG) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cynthia Ray Ramey. (Arnold, Joey) |
Filing 1 SSA COMPLAINT against ANDREW SAUL, filed by Cynthia Ray Ramey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons on U. S. Attorney General, U. S. Attorney and Office of the General Counsel)(Arnold, Joey) |
District Judge Clifton L Corker and Magistrate Judge Christopher H Steger added. (AMP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.