Andrews v. Miller et al
Plaintiff: Namaire Q. Andrews
Defendant: Jeme Mosley, Ken Miller and Edith Hacker
Case Number: 2:2021cv00014
Filed: January 25, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Thomas A Varlan
Referring Judge: Cynthia R Wyrick
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2021 Case transferred from Tennessee Eastern has been opened in Eastern District of Kentucky as case 6:21-cv-00045, filed 03/18/2021. (AMP)
March 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 JUDGMENT ORDER. Even liberally construing the complaint in favor of Plaintiff, it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under 1983 as to Defendant Marshal Miller. Accordingly, Defendant Marshal Miller is DISMISSED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to transfer the remainder of this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky and to close this Court's file. Signed by District Judge Thomas A. Varlan on 3/18/21. (c/m per #4 )(ADA)
March 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 will be GRANTED. Plaintiff will be ASSESSED the civil filing fee of $350.00. The custodian of Plaintiffs inmate trust account will be DIRECTED to submit the filing fee to the Clerk in the manner set forth. Judgment Order to follow. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 3/18/21. (c/m Namaire Q. Andrews LAUREL COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER 206 WEST 4TH STREET LONDON, KY 40741 and custodian of inmate accounts)(ADA)
March 18, 2021 Case electronically transferred to District of Eastern District of Kentucky. (ADA)
January 25, 2021 Filing 3 Notice Regarding Requirement to Notify Court of Change of Address. (Copy of Notice mailed to Namaire Q. Andrews) (CAT)
January 25, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Namaire Q. Andrews. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Inmate Trust Account, #2 Trust Account Details, #3 Envelope) (CAT)
January 25, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Edith Hacker, Ken Miller, Jeme Mosley (Filing fee NOT PAID), filed by Namaire Q. Andrews. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (CAT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Andrews v. Miller et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeme Mosley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ken Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edith Hacker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Namaire Q. Andrews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?