Boggs v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
| Genevieve Luana Boggs |
| Social Security Administration, Commissioner of |
| SSA Office of General Counsel |
| 2:2021cv00017 |
| January 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Travis R McDonough |
| Debra C Poplin |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
SUPPLEMENT CIVIL COVER SHEET by Genevieve Luana Boggs. (Darnell, David)
|
|
Filing 3
Administrative Notice to Counsel #1 Complaint - SSA : Please file a Civil Cover Sheet in a non-fillable format as a Supplement found under Other Documents and link it back to the Complaint. Requirements due by 2/2/2021. (CAT)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Summons U.S. Attorney General, #2 Summons U.S. Attorney) (CAT)
|
|
Filing 1
SSA COMPLAINT of Genevieve Boggs against Commissioner of Social Security ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNEDC-4637465.), filed by Genevieve Luana Boggs. (Attachments: #1 Summons Gen counsel, #2 Summons Att General, #3 Summons US Atty)(Darnell, David)
|
|
District Judge Travis R McDonough and Magistrate Judge Debra C Poplin added. (CAT)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
