Hurrelbrink v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
| Robin A Hurrelbrink |
| Social Security Administration, Commissioner of |
| SSA Office of General Counsel |
| 2:2021cv00143 |
| September 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Katherine A Crytzer |
| Debra C Poplin |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Robin A Hurrelbrink. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of served on 9/17/2021. (Smith, Harry)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Robin A Hurrelbrink. SSA Office of General Counsel served on 9/20/2021. (Smith, Harry)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Robin A Hurrelbrink. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of served on 9/24/2021. (Smith, Harry)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (BJL)
|
|
Filing 1
SSA COMPLAINT Complaint against Social Security Administration, Commissioner of ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNEDC-4843798.), filed by Robin A Hurrelbrink. (Attachments: #1 Other Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons US Attorney General, #3 Summons General Counsel, #4 Summons US Attorney)(Smith, Harry)
|
|
District Judge Katherine A Crytzer and Magistrate Judge Debra C Poplin added. (BJL)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
