Hall v. Staubus et al
Plaintiff: Capurs Hall
Defendant: Barry P Staubus, Sullivan County Tennessee D.A. Office, Katherine Jones and Gene Perrin
Case Number: 2:2022cv00027
Filed: March 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: J Ronnie Greer
Referring Judge: Cynthia R Wyrick
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 JUDGMENT ORDER re #8 Memorandum Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated by the Court in the memorandum opinion filed with this order, Plaintiff Capurs Hall's objections [Doc. 7] are OVERRULED, and the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE United States Magistrate Judge Cynthia R. Wyrick's report and recommendation under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). For the reasons in the report and recommendation, and for the reasons in the Court's memorandum opinion, Mr. Hall's complaint is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 05/05/2022. (Copy of Judgment Order mailed to Capurs Hall) (CAT)
May 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Mr. Hall's objections [Doc. 7] are OVERRULED. The Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE Judge Wyrick's report and recommendation under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). For the reasons in the report and recommendation, and for the reasons in this memorandum opinion, Mr. Hall's complaint is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case. See Memorandum Opinion and Order for details. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 05/05/2022. (Copy of Memorandum Opinion and Order mailed to Capurs Hall) (CAT)
April 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 OBJECTION to #6 Report and Recommendations, filed by Capurs Hall. (JCK)
April 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint filed by Capurs Hall. Plaintiff has failed to set forth any basis upon which relief can be granted against Defendants nor are the deficiencies in the Complaint of the type whichcould be adequately addressed through further factual development. As such, the Court RECOMMENDS the Complaint [Doc. 1] be DISMISSED with prejudice. This matter is to now to be presented to the District Judge pursuant to this Report and Recommendation under the authority of Gibson v. R.G. Smith Co., 195 F.2d at 263, wherein the Court states that such matters proceed automatically to a district judge for examination of the complaint after a magistrate judge has granted the petition to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia R Wyrick on 4/13/2022. (Copy of Order mailed to Capurs Hall). (LCK)
April 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Letter from Capurs Hall requesting status of pending IFP motion. (JCK)
March 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Pro Se MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Capurs Hall. (Attachments: #1 Other Envelope)(LCK)
February 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Notice Regarding Requirement to Notify Court of Change of Address (Copy of Notice mailed to Caprus Hall)(JCK)
February 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE of Deficiency (IFP) - The Court is in receipt of your complaint/petition. However, in order for this matter to proceed, you must either pay the required filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Copy of Notice and IFP form mailed to Capurs Hall)(JCK)
February 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Katherine Jones, Gene Perrin, Barry P Staubus, Sullivan County Tennessee D.A. Office (Filing fee NOT PAID ), filed by Capurs Hall. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JCK)
February 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge Cynthia R Wyrick added due to case opening assignment error, no MJ assigned to case upon initial assignment. (JCK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hall v. Staubus et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Capurs Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barry P Staubus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sullivan County Tennessee D.A. Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Katherine Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gene Perrin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?